Looming discontinuities in U.S. military strategy and defense planning

colliding RMAs necessitate a new strategy
  • 57 Pages
  • 0.90 MB
  • 4282 Downloads
  • English
by
RAND , Santa Monica, CA
Military planning, Forecasting, Military policy, Armed F
Other titlesLooming discontinuities in United States military strategy and defense planning
StatementPaul K. Davis, Peter A. Wilson
SeriesOccasional paper -- OP-326-OSD
ContributionsWilson, Peter A., 1943-, United States. Dept. of Defense. Office of the Secretary of Defense, National Defense Research Institute (U.S.), Rand Corporation
Classifications
LC ClassificationsU153 .D3826 2011
The Physical Object
Paginationxxi, 57 p. :
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL25346048M
ISBN 100833052101
ISBN 139780833052100
LC Control Number2011924500
OCLC/WorldCa708578135

Looming Discontinuities in U.S. Military Strategy and Defense Planning. Colliding RMAs Necessitate a New Strategy.

Details Looming discontinuities in U.S. military strategy and defense planning EPUB

by Paul K. Davis, Peter A. Wilson. Related Topics: Military Strategy, Military Technology, Military Transformation, Warfare and Military Operations; Citation; Embed; View related productsCited by: 6. Get this from a library. Looming discontinuities in U.S.

military strategy and defense planning: colliding RMAs necessitate a new strategy. [Paul K Davis; Peter A Wilson; United States.

Department of Defense. Office of the Secretary of Defense.; National Defense Research Institute (U.S.); Rand Corporation.] -- The authors argue that the United States is entering a period of.

The Looming Crisis in Defense Planning. Published in: JFQ, Joint Force Quarterly, no. 63, Oct. Looming Discontinuities in U.S. Military Strategy and Defense Planning: Colliding RMAs Necessitate a New Strategy.

Research Looming discontinuities in U.S. military strategy and defense planning book by: 1. Paul Davis & Peter Wilson, Looming Discontinuities in US Military Strategy & Defense Planning, Rand Corporation () Feb. 17 Limited War Here we consider two different examples of limited war.

The first is about limited nuclear war, and the second a. That is the default setting of the U.S. military, after all: to be ready to “fight and win the nation’s wars.” But over the last half century, presence — understood as deep engagement in service of global stability — has become an ever-more important part of U.S.

defense strategy, and a major demand signal for force posture. In this two-part blog post, Government Book Talk takes an in-depth look at several new publications from the U.S.

Army War College. (Permission granted for use of United States Army War College Press logo) The U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) recently has published a few very timely monographs with a primary focus on U.S.

national security. "The American Way of War" Revisited. Looming Discontinuities in U.S. Military Strategy and Defense Planning: Colliding RMAs Necessitate a New Strategy The United States is. Provides the very best in thinking about national security in support of the Strategy and Force Planning course within the National Security Decision Making Department of the Naval War College.

Explores the economic, political, and military components of national security strategy. Examines broad force planning concepts/5. The Coming Challenges in Defense Planning Programming and Budgeting: This brief analyzes the budgeting and planning challenges the Department of Defense (DOD) faces at it enters FY In particular, it focuses on the budgeting and planning challenges raised by rising Operations and Maintenance costs, sustained high tempo of operations.

Fateful Transitions Daniel M. Kliman Published by University of Pennsylvania Press Kliman, Daniel M. former Department of Defense official Douglas Paal, former director of the American Institute in Taiwan Looming Discontinuities in U.S.

Military Strategy and Defense Planning: Colliding RMAs Necessitate a New Strategy. Santa Monica,Cited by: 2. On February 6,the Bush Administration announced the creation of a new unified combatant command, U.S.

Africa Command or AFRICOM, to promote U. Military leaders and strategists and international relations scholars may be interested in this work. Graduate students pursuing coursework in military science degree programs or world history may be interested in this analysis for research papers.

Bibliography Cornell, Svante E., Johanna Popjanevski, and Niklas Nilsson, Russia’s War in Georgia: Causes and Implications for Georgia and the World, Washington, D.C.: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Johns Hopkins. US News is a recognized leader in college, grad school, hospital, mutual fund, and car rankings.

Track elected officials, research health conditions, and. United States Army War College Department of Military Strategy, Planning, and Operations Campaign Planning Handbook Academic Year [US Army, United States Government] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

United States Army War College Department of Military Strategy, Planning, and Operations Campaign Planning Handbook Academic Year Author: United States Government US Army.

United States Army War College Department of Military Strategy, Planning, and Operations Campaign Planning Handbook Academic Year - Kindle edition by US Army, United States Government. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets.

Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading United States Army War Author: United States Government US Army. The Science of War is an informative text book, although no more than adequate for its purpose.

It examines four "scientific," quantitative areas of war planning - budget analysis, combat modeling, logistics and defense technology, providing generalists with basic frameworks through which to analyze major issues facing the military/5. Despite numerous mistakes and challenges, U.S defense has won the Cold War, prevented another 9/11, limited the scale of nuclear weapons proliferation, sustained a U.S.-led coalition accounting Author: Michael E.

O'hanlon. Just what makes a military technology disruptive. How does one know who will disrupt, and who will be disrupted. How can we aim to develop disruptive technolog. The defense technology and industrial base (DTIB) is a crucial element of U.S.

military strength because it provides the capability to develop, produce, and support military systems in peacetime and to respond to additional military requirements in crisis or war.

The Trump administration’s first National Defense Strategy, which was released last Friday, outlines the U.S. Department of Defense’s national security goals in a world it describes as rife with great power competition between the United States, Russia, and China.

Climate change – which some military leaders warn poses a looming threat to the. "Looming Discontinuities in U.S. Military Strategy and Defense Planning" describes a disturbing convergence of several adverse trends that the authors believe could result in the sudden obsolescence of long-accepted U.S.

military strategies, operating concepts, and forces. The Need for a New U.S. Force Planning Exercise. Novem President-elect Trump campaigned on making broad increases in U.S. military forces: Raising U.S. Army manning fromactive-duty soldiers toMarine Corps manning frommarines toNavy combat strength from deployable ships toand the.

In March, the Rand Corp. released an even darker analysis of the future for U.S. military plans. "Looming Discontinuities in U.S. Military Strategy and Defense Planning" describes a disturbing convergence of several adverse trends that the authors believe could result in the sudden obsolescence of long-accepted U.S.

military strategies. Today’s U.S. defense budget, nearly $ billion in round numbers, is down substantially from the peak of some $ billion a year that characterized the late Bush and early Obama period.

The solution provides a detailed description of deliberate planning and explains how it supports our national military strategy. The solution also provides an example of a scenario that could require the use of deliberate planning. Start studying THE GOVERNANCE OF THE NAVY. STRATEGIC GUIDANCE FOR THE ARMED FORCES.

Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. proffered that can aid commanders and their staffs in the formulation of strategy. The acceptance of military theories of strategy by military professionals, however, has been slow to take.

In its capstone doctrinal manual, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States (Joint Staff ), the U.S. military still only recognized two theories ofCited by: 2. U.S. Army War College Press OPERATING IN THE GRAY ZONE: AN ALTERNATIVE PARADIGM FOR U.S. MILITARY STRATEGY Antulio J.

Download Looming discontinuities in U.S. military strategy and defense planning FB2

Echevarria II April The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S.

Government. Get Textbooks on Google Play. Rent and save from the world's largest eBookstore. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone.

Description Looming discontinuities in U.S. military strategy and defense planning FB2

U.S. Army Symposium on Strategy, Force Structure And Defense Planning for the 21st Century Novem Role of Missile Defense in U.S. National Security Strategy by Lieutenant General Lester L. Lyles, USAF Ballistic Missile Defense has a rich and long history within the Department of Defense, reaching back into the 's.A national defense strategy must include, for the U.S.

and its transatlantic allies, an understanding of cyber dangers related to nuclear facilities, strategic warning systems, and nuclear command and control. These dangers need to be addressed urgently to prevent the potentially catastrophic consequences of a cyber attack on a nuclear facility.The relegation of so-called rogue states and terrorist groups may seem premature, given the immediacy of these purportedly lesser concerns.

It’s North Korea that is the focus of a reportedly contentious debate in the White House about whether to conduct a limited, “punitive” strike following the North’s next nuclear or ballistic missile test, and whatever the U.S.

decides to do Author: Phillip Orchard.